Endothelial keratoplasty — DMEK, DSAEK, PK
The surgical principle was transformed by the shift from penetrating keratoplasty to posterior lamellar surgery: instead of replacing the whole corneal thickness, only the diseased tissue is substituted. The thinner the graft, the more healthy tissue is spared and the better the optical quality — at the cost of more delicate handling.
8.1 DMEK — the reference
Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) transplants Descemet membrane bearing its endothelium alone. It restores near-native anatomy, offers the best visual recovery (often ≥ 20/25), induces few aberrations, and has the lowest rejection rate of all keratoplasties (~1–2%/year). The trade-off is a demanding preparation and unscrolling. Technical points: SCUBA preparation, orientation marking ("S-stamp" to avoid upside-down implantation), unscrolling and gas tamponade (air/SF6). Graft detachment is the main complication, with re-bubbling needed in ~15–30% of cases.
8.2 DSAEK — the robust compromise
DSAEK transplants the endothelium and its Descemet with a thin lamella of posterior stroma. Technically more forgiving, it remains excellent for complex eyes (aphakia, glaucoma tube, altered iris); it caps visual quality slightly and induces a mild hyperopic shift from the added stromal lenticle. Ultra-thin (UT-DSAEK, < 100 µm) variants approach DMEK optics.
8.3 Penetrating keratoplasty (PK) — residual indications
Full-thickness grafting has yielded first place but retains a role with associated stromal opacity, repeated failure, or anatomy precluding lamellar surgery. It carries higher risk of rejection, astigmatism and suture-related issues.
Hemi-DMEK and quarter-DMEK allow two to four recipients from a single endothelial graft — cell migration recolonising uncovered zones. Pre-cut / pre-loaded eye-bank tissue: standardisation and shorter operating time.
Cell therapy & tissue engineering
Graft scarcity and the non-regenerative nature of the endothelium drive donor-independent approaches.
The most advanced is intracameral injection of cultured endothelial cells combined with a ROCK inhibitor that promotes adhesion (Kinoshita): transparency has been durably restored in endothelial dysfunction, a single donor potentially supplying several recipients.
Upstream, tissue engineering aims to fabricate the graft. TEEK seeds endothelial cells on an ultrathin, transparent, biocompatible carrier, yielding a transplantable monolayer using an already-mastered technique. 3D bioprinting pushes toward automated production: controlled monolayer deposition, cells derived from pluripotent stem cells (iPSC), dedicated bioinks (hyaluronic acid, gelatin), with functional markers (ZO-1, Na⁺/K⁺-ATPase). Preclinical work, but a path to a donor-independent "bespoke" endothelium. Alongside, the synthetic artificial endothelial implant (EndoArt), donor-independent, has shown favourable results in chronic edema — draining water mechanically without restoring cellular function.
| Approach | Principle | Current place | Limits |
|---|---|---|---|
| DMEK | Descemet + endothelium graft | Reference established edema | Delicate prep, detachment |
| DSAEK | + posterior stromal lamella | Complex eyes | Capped vision, hyperopic shift |
| PK | Full-thickness graft | Associated stromal disease | Rejection, astigmatism, sutures |
| DSO / DWEK | Central descemetorhexis, no graft | Central guttata, preserved reserve | Not in diffuse forms; slow clearance, failures |
| ROCK inhibitors | Migration, pump/barrier, anti-EndoMT | DSO adjuvant/rescue; post-phaco protection | Not approved as monotherapy |
| Cell injection + ROCK | Cultured CEC intracamerally | Clinically validated (Kinoshita) | Still limited diffusion |
| TEEK / 3D bioprinting | Engineered endothelium on carrier | Preclinical | Function, carrier maturation |
| Artificial implant (EndoArt) | Synthetic membrane, no donor | Selected chronic edema | No cellular function restored |