Surface photoablation (PRK & variants)
Photorefractive keratectomy was the first clinical use of the excimer. The principle stayed simple: remove the central epithelium, apply photoablation directly to Bowman's layer and anterior stroma, then let the epithelium heal under a bandage lens. What evolved is epithelial management:
It removes a theoretical epithelial thickness (standardised profile), not the patient's actual epithelium. Yet the epithelium remodels to mask underlying stromal irregularities: ablating an average epithelium favours the surgeon more than the patient — hence the value of OCT epithelial-mapping-guided profiles.
The historical price of surface ablation is haze — a subepithelial myofibroblast veil, mainly after high corrections and UV exposure. Intraoperative mitomycin C transformed the outlook by inhibiting this fibroblastic response, rehabilitating surface ablation for errors once reserved for LASIK.
LASIK — ablation under a flap
LASIK separates access from sculpting. First an anterior lamellar flap (epithelium, Bowman, superficial stroma) is cut and lifted on its hinge; the exposed stromal bed is photoablated; the flap is repositioned and adheres by endothelial pump, without sutures. Immediate benefit: with Bowman and epithelium intact on the flap, pain is minimal and recovery takes hours. The double price: the flap consumes load-bearing tissue and its cut severs corneal nerves (dryness).
Flap creation migrated from the mechanical microkeratome (fast but variable thickness) to the femtosecond laser, which makes a flap of planned, regular, reproducible thickness with angled edges (better adhesion, less epithelial ingrowth). This predictability is not cosmetic: it directly governs the residual stromal bed calculation, hence the safety margin.
Lenticule extraction (SMILE, SILK)
The latest generation dispenses with the excimer entirely. The femtosecond laser cuts, within intact stroma, a lenticule whose geometry carries the whole correction; it is extracted through a small peripheral incision, without lifting a flap. By breaking only a short incision rather than a full circular cut, these techniques preserve anterior lamellae and nerves better — theoretically more favourable biomechanics and dryness.
SMILE (VisuMax) led the way with a plano-convex lenticule. SILK (ELITA, CE 2023) offers an ultra-low-energy variant (~40–90 nJ, ~1 µm spot) and, crucially, a biconvex lenticule with matched faces, limiting micro-folding on removal and minimising induced spherical aberration. Series cover myopia to −12 D and astigmatism to −6 D, with fast recovery and usually easy dissection. This is a technique I perform, and its place is being defined as biomechanical and nerve-regeneration data accumulate.
Differentiating the techniques
Three ways to reach the same optical profile, three relationships to tissue: surface works on the anterior face after de-epithelialisation; LASIK sculpts a bed under a flap; extraction removes an intrastromal volume through a single incision.
| Criterion | Surface (PRK) | LASIK | Lenticule (SMILE/SILK) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stromal access | De-epithelialisation | Lamellar flap | Short incision |
| Sculpting | Excimer, at surface | Excimer, in the bed | Femtosecond, lenticule |
| Permanent flap | No | Yes | No |
| Pain / recovery | Marked / 3–5 d | Minimal / hours | Low / 1–2 d |
| Corneal nerves | Little affected | Circular cut | Relative sparing |
| Load-bearing tissue | Preserved (no flap) | Reduced by flap | Preserved (no flap) |